The Orgasmic Roots of Pronoia

[edkelley]

Here is a link to an article about tantra I really enjoyed. It's a bit long and esoteric, but offers some key secrets in plain language. The woman's role in enabling a man to have multiple non-ejaculatory orgasms is even brought up, and for me confirms something I'd long suspected.

[JPender]

Interesting read and knowing the intellectual that you are Mr. Edkelly I am glad to have you bring this type of information to the forum.

Taken from the article that you have linked to ~

"I speculated that there are four types of women who might sabotage the long-lasting male lover:

1. Some women regard a fast squirt as testimony to their overpowering irresistibility. "He found me so alluring that he couldn't contain himself." Many of this type are throwbacks to an age when a wife regarded her man's pleasure as more important than hers; when a female measured her success in love more by her ability to give gratification than to get it.

2. Some women may not want a rush to judgment but are nevertheless strongly attached to having a smoking gun: concrete proof that they've done their job of satisfying their men. No ejaculationless orgasm for these women, thank you; it's too ambiguous.

3. Some women conspire to induce a quick and seemingly accidental orgasm because they want to use it to humble their partner, berate him for his inadequacy, and have a bargaining chip to use in winning other, nonsexual concessions.

4. Some women are possessed by their DNA with the same demonic fervor as any man is by his. The 30-year-old ego may be crying out, "Give me deep pleasure," while the 10 million-year-old reproductive machinery is hissing, "Give me a baby." The mandate to propagate the species wants the ejaculation now, not in two hours. Why else would evolution have made it so absurdly easy for a man to come?

I reiterate that these four motivations are not necessarily blazing in the conscious awareness of women who are in the throes of making love. They may be unconscious programs that covertly shape the way their body functions."

For me I am not sure what use it is to put blame on the opposite sex for what you might consider your problems...

Would love to her some of your insight into this...

[edkelley]

Originally Posted by JPender

For me I am not sure what use it is to put blame on the opposite sex for what you might consider your problems...

LOLZ homie, how can I? It would be hypocritical! I'm trying to make my women squirt at every opportunity!

But what we are dealing with here is a dynamic interaction. Intimacy opens one up to influence from the other. And if one wants true understanding, every aspect of the equation must be accounted for. And notice further in to the article (I think) how he meets a woman who has some self knowledge and is aware of (and has integrated) this unconscious desire, and how that allows both of their pleasure and intimacy to pass over into a religious/spiritual experience.

I'm always amazed at the nearly diametric difference between Tantra and "status quo sex"; squirting women and men having multiple orgasms without getting logy.